Close of Evidence; Closing Arguments; Jury Instructions; Jury Deliberations Self-Quiz
Marla sued
Toby for breach of contract under the laws of the state of Texarkana.
Contract laws under this jurisdiction establish that the plaintiff has
the burden of proving that there was an offer to enter into a contractual
agreement, that the parties understood the nature of the agreement and
accepted the terms of the agreement, and that the parties signed a written
and legally binding document to establish that a contract was formed.
During trial, Marla’s attorney provided documentation of the negotiations,
the testimony of Marla’s secretary who witnessed the negotiations,
and the original written and signed contract. At the close of the introduction
of evidence to the court, which of the following motions may the defendant’s
attorney make?
|
During his
closing statement, Alex, attorney for the defendant, begins arguing that
the law does not support the plaintiff’s position and that the plaintiff
has no case. The plaintiff’s attorney objects to the closing statement
on the grounds that it is improper. In his response that the closing statement
was proper, the Judge explains the purpose of an opening statement. Which
of the following purposes is not proper and, therefore, excluded from
the Judge’s explanation?
|
The purpose
of jury instructions in most jurisdictions is to:
|
© 2003 - 2024 National Paralegal College